Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548972›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026

Health and well-being comparison between residents of serviced housing for older people and community-dwelling older adults in japan: a propensity score matching analysis.

Hequn Wang, Kenjiro Kawaguchi, Ling Ling, Kazushige Ide, Atsushi Nakagomi, Katsunori Kondo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hequn WangAdvanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8067-5029
Kenjiro KawaguchiDepartment of Social Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1327-5022
Ling LingDepartment of Social Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-0557
Kazushige IdeDepartment of Community Building for Well-being, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-354X
Atsushi NakagomiDepartment of Social Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-696X
Katsunori KondoDepartment of Community Building for Well-being, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, Japan. kkondo@chiba-u.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-816X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeServiced Housing for Older People (SHOP) in Japan offers barrier-free living environments and supportive services to enhance the health and well-being of older adults. This study aimed to compare the health and well-being of SHOP residents with community-dwelling older adults and to compare factors that may influence them.

methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized propensity score matching to compare the health and well-being of 1,080 SHOP residents (69.4% female; mean age: 83.9 years) with 7,560 community-dwelling older adults (67.8% female; mean age: 84.1 years) from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. Health and well-being were assessed using nine items. Additionally, social behaviours and social factors such as laughing frequency, regular outings, hobbies, depression, participation in preventive care activities, meeting friends frequently, emotional support, and eating with others, were compared.

resultsSHOP residents exhibited significantly higher levels of happiness, life satisfaction, and physical health compared to community-dwelling older adults. They were more engaged in activities like regular outings, attending preventive care activities, meeting friends, and eating with others. They also reported higher frequencies of laughter and received emotional support.

conclusionSHOP may improve the health and well-being of older adults. These findings can help in developing age-friendly housing initiatives to address the challenges of an aging society.

Indexed as

Health StatusHousing for the ElderlyIndependent LivingPersonal SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMalePropensity ScorePsychological Well-BeingSocial SupportHuman flourishingMental healthPhysical healthSocial interactionSocial participation

Identifiers

PMID40548972
PMCPMC13226352

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.