Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Predictive value of [
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exploring the Application Value of PET Molecular Imaging Targeting FAP in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
The Diagnostic Efficiency of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Malignant Tumors
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computational and AI-Enabled Imaging Biomarkers for Predicting and Assessing Immunotherapy Response in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Functional Meta-Synthesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Gallium-Containing Agents for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy: Current Status and Future Prospects.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- The application and prospect of granzyme B-targeted PET imaging in cancer immunotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis prospective study aimed to investigate the performance of [
methodsThirty-one treatment-naïve OSCC patients (stage III-IVA) scheduled to receive two cycles of NACI followed by radical surgery were enrolled. [
resultsTwenty patients were included in the final analysis. Eight patients (40.0%) achieved major pathological response (MPR), including 6 with pathologic complete response (pCR), while 12 patients (60.0%) were categorized as non-MPR according to postoperative histopathological findings. The average preoperative SUVmax was significantly lower in the MPR group (9.38 ± 2.60) compared with that in the non-MPR group (16.20 ± 5.23; P = 0.003), while baseline SUVmax was not significantly different (P = 0.053). The ∆SUVmax (%) in the MPR group (- 59.10% ± 13.33) was notably lower than that in the non-MPR group (- 15.96%, [- 52.56%, 66.33%]; P = 0.002). Preoperative SUVs and ∆SUVs were significantly associated with pathologic response. FAP expression was positively correlated with preoperative SUVs, and the MPR group showed higher CD8 and GZMB expression versus the non-MPR group.
conclusion[ CLINICAL
trial registrationThis prospective study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, and was registered online at NIH ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05034146 & NCT05030597).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40548990What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.