ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Integrated multiomics analysis and machine learning refine molecular subtypes and prognosis for thyroid cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State of the Art on Thyroid Cancer Biology and Oncology.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyroid cancer (THCA) exhibits high molecular heterogeneity, posing challenges for precise prognosis and personalized therapy. Most existing models rely on single-omics data and limited algorithms, reducing robustness and clinical value.
methodsWe integrated five omics layers from THCA patients using eleven clustering algorithms to identify molecular subtypes. Based on stable prognosis-related genes (SPRGs), we applied 99 combinations of ten machine learning methods to construct a robust prognostic model-Consensus Machine Learning-Driven Signature (CMLS). The model was validated across multiple internal and external cohorts. Immunogenomic characteristics and drug sensitivity were also evaluated.
resultsThree molecular subtypes (CS1-CS3) with distinct clinical outcomes and molecular features were identified; CS2 showed the worst prognosis. A nine-gene CMLS was established, demonstrating strong prognostic performance across cohorts. Patients in the low-CMLS group had better outcomes, stronger immune infiltration, higher TMB/TNB, and greater predicted responsiveness to immunotherapy. Conversely, the high-CMLS group exhibited poor prognosis and lower immunotherapy sensitivity. Drug screening identified six candidate agents for high-CMLS patients.
conclusionOur study provides a robust multiomics-based classification of THCA and develops a clinically relevant CMLS model for prognostic prediction and therapy guidance. These findings may facilitate risk stratification and inform personalized treatment strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.