ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2026
A theory-informed approach to identify barriers to utilising Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in practice: from vicious cycles to sustainable solutions.
Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a vital tool for diagnosis of life-threatening conditions, with broad consensus supporting its integration into medical curricula. Despite evidence of effectiveness of POCUS training, many clinicians do not utilise skills in practice, resulting in missed patient benefits. Research on the barriers to POCUS utilisation remains limited. To address this, we conducted a theory-informed exploratory qualitative case study to investigate the utilisation of Focused Intensive Care Echo (FICE) in a specialist heart and lung hospital. The investigation was framed using situated learning and activity theory. We undertook 28 interviews, three focus groups (N = 27) and two expert discussions. Thematic analysis identified barriers while difference-within-similarity-analysis (Hofmann, 2020) uncovered how these interact to hinder POCUS-utilisation. We demonstrate how barriers preventing trainees from using POCUS interacted with the wider activity system, forming vicious cycles to further hinder use. These vicious cycles related to enthusiasm, opportunity, support, participation, communication and norms that hindered POCUS-use, and manifest as an underlying tension between competing priorities of POCUS training and patient care. We discuss how theoretically re-framing the findings suggests low/medium-resource mechanisms which helped mitigate this tension and overcome the vicious cycles. These facilitative mechanisms could generate scalable and sustainable solutions to support POCUS-training and utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.