Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549134›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2025

Uncovering Pregnancy Exposures in Pharmacovigilance Case Report Databases: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the VigiBase Pregnancy Algorithm.

Lovisa Sandberg, Sara Hedfors Vidlin, Levente K-Pápai, Ruth Savage, Boukje C Raemaekers, Henric Taavola-Gustafsson, Annette Rudolph, Lucy Quirant, Tomas Bergvall, Magnus Wallberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lovisa SandbergUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. lovisa.sandberg@who-umc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-5244
Sara Hedfors VidlinUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1619-3751
Levente K-PápaiUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-8960
Ruth SavageUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-0849
Boukje C RaemaekersUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3946-3340
Henric Taavola-GustafssonUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-2810
Annette RudolphUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2360-7174
Lucy QuirantUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5779-5066
Tomas BergvallUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-3431
Magnus WallbergUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2681-2226
Johan ElleniusUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6447-8415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation on the safety of medicine use during pregnancy is limited at the time of marketing, making post-marketing surveillance essential. However, the lack of a specific indicator for pregnancy-related case reports within the international standard for transmission of individual case safety reports complicates the retrieval of such reports in pharmacovigilance databases. To address this, an algorithm to identify reports of exposures during pregnancy was developed in VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of adverse event reports.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate and characterise the VigiBase pregnancy algorithm.

methodsThe rule-based algorithm uses multiple structured data elements in the International Council of Harmonisation (ICH) E2B transmission format that could potentially hold pregnancy-related information, to determine if a case report qualifies as a pregnancy case. Free text information is not considered. Three datasets were used for the evaluation. The "Full dataset" comprised deduplicated VigiBase data up to January 2023. The "Downsampled dataset" was a subsample of the Full dataset, adjusted to increase the prevalence of pregnancy reports by excluding individuals aged 45 years or older and male individuals aged 18 years or older, used to evaluate recall (i.e. sensitivity). The "Random dataset" was a straight random sample of the Full dataset, used to evaluate precision (i.e. positive predictive value). As a baseline for comparison, the Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA

resultsIn the Downsampled dataset with 7874 annotated reports, 253 reports were annotated as pregnancy cases. Of those, the algorithm recalled 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69-80), increasing to 91% (95% CI 86-95) when restricting the analysis to reports adhering to the ICH E2B format. Preprocessing obstacles of incomplete mapping of specific pregnancy terms to MedDRA

conclusionsThe VigiBase pregnancy algorithm demonstrates robust performance, highlighting its potential to facilitate pharmacovigilance related to pregnancy. Our evaluation establishes a valuable benchmark for future research and emphasises the need for global harmonisation of standards for reporting pregnancy exposures.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceAdultFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40549134
PMCPMC12423168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.