Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Unilateral contralesional versus bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with post stroke dysphagia: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Mechanisms of Combined Central-Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Prefrontal-Sensorimotor Cortex Connectivity in Post-Stroke Dysphagia after Supratentorial Stroke: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Parallel-Controlled Trial.Translational stroke research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Neurophysiological Mechanisms of 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Revista de neurologia · 2026Trial
- Clinical insights on "unilateral contralesional versus bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with post-stroke dysphagia".Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of rTMS-augmented rehabilitation for post-stroke language and swallowing dysfunction: a sham-controlled prospective study with theory-informed interpretation.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysphagia is a frequent and challenging complication after stroke, severely impacting both recovery and quality of life. Conventional rehabilitation approaches often yield limited results, underscoring the need for novel treatments. This work compared the effectiveness of two different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) approaches in enhancing swallowing function in post-stroke dysphagia (PSD).
methodsThis prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted with 60 patients, 18-80 years old, diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and suffered from PSD. Participants were randomized equally to three groups: Group 1 received bilateral facilitatory rTMS targeting both hemispheres, Group 2 received unilateral facilitatory rTMS on the contralesional hemisphere, and Group 3 received sham rTMS.
resultsMotor threshold (MT) scores were similar across the three groups at baseline (date 0). At follow-up, Group 1 showed significantly lower MT scores than Group 3 at dates 1 and 3 (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Group 2 and Groups 1 and 3. At date 2, Group 1 had significantly lower MT scores than both Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), while scores between Group 2 and Group 3 were comparable. MT was comparable among the groups at date 0, 1, 2, and 3. For the Modified Rankin Scale, at date 3, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly lower scores than Group 3, with no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2.
conclusionsBilateral facilitatory rTMS is an effective and safe intervention for improving swallowing function in PSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.