Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549264›Full record

Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Unilateral contralesional versus bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with post stroke dysphagia: a randomized controlled study.

Basem Hamdy Fouda, Ahmed Mostafa Kishk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Clinical insights on "unilateral contralesional versus bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with post-stroke dysphagia".Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Basem Hamdy FoudaNeuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. basem.fouda@med.tanta.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7982-5918
Ahmed Mostafa KishkNeuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysphagia is a frequent and challenging complication after stroke, severely impacting both recovery and quality of life. Conventional rehabilitation approaches often yield limited results, underscoring the need for novel treatments. This work compared the effectiveness of two different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) approaches in enhancing swallowing function in post-stroke dysphagia (PSD).

methodsThis prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted with 60 patients, 18-80 years old, diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke and suffered from PSD. Participants were randomized equally to three groups: Group 1 received bilateral facilitatory rTMS targeting both hemispheres, Group 2 received unilateral facilitatory rTMS on the contralesional hemisphere, and Group 3 received sham rTMS.

resultsMotor threshold (MT) scores were similar across the three groups at baseline (date 0). At follow-up, Group 1 showed significantly lower MT scores than Group 3 at dates 1 and 3 (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Group 2 and Groups 1 and 3. At date 2, Group 1 had significantly lower MT scores than both Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), while scores between Group 2 and Group 3 were comparable. MT was comparable among the groups at date 0, 1, 2, and 3. For the Modified Rankin Scale, at date 3, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly lower scores than Group 3, with no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2.

conclusionsBilateral facilitatory rTMS is an effective and safe intervention for improving swallowing function in PSD.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersFunctional LateralityIschemic StrokeStrokeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeDysphagiaNeuroplasticityRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationStrokeSwallowing rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40549264
PMCPMC12394355

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.