Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549810›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis.

Ayşe Banu Birlik, Hakan Tozan, Kevser Banu Köse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayşe Banu BirlikDepartment of Healthcare System Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5148-3784
Hakan TozanCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait.
Kevser Banu KöseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1766-2778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality risk after cardiac surgery is essential to improve patient outcomes. Traditional models, such as EuroSCORE I, often struggle to capture the complex interactions among clinical variables, leading to suboptimal performance in specific populations. In this study, we developed and validated the Ensemble-Based Risk Estimation System (ERES), a machine learning model designed to enhance mortality prediction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. A retrospective analysis of 543 patients was performed using six machine learning algorithms applied to preoperative clinical data to assess predictive accuracy and clinical outcomes. Feature selection techniques, including Gini importance, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling, were employed to improve accuracy and address class imbalance. ERES, which utilizes 15 key features, demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to EuroSCORE I. Calibration plots indicated more accurate probability estimates, whereas SHAP analysis identified creatinine, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction as the most significant predictors. The decision curve analysis further confirmed the superior clinical utility of ERES across a range of decision thresholds. Additionally, although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA PS) score had limited predictive power independently, its combination with EuroSCORE I enhanced the predictive performance. Integrating machine learning models like ERES into clinical practice can improve decision making and patient outcomes although external validation is warranted for broader implementation.

Identifiers

PMID40549810
PMCPMC12184902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.