ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Real-time locomotion mode detection in individuals with transfemoral amputation and osseointegration.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite notable advancements in prosthetic leg technology, commercially available devices with embedded algorithms utilizing bioelectric signals for prosthetic leg control are lacking. This untapped potential could enhance current prosthetic leg capabilities, enabling more natural movements. However, individuals with short residual limbs have limited available muscle and it has not been investigated if different locomotion modes can be predicted in real-time in this population. Here, we explored the feasibility of using electromyographic signals in individuals with short residual limbs and osseointegrated implants to infer locomotion modes.
methodsWe recorded data from five participants with transfemoral amputation and osseointegration while walking on level ground, stairs, and ramps. Electromyography, acceleration, angular velocity, and ground reaction force were collected using wireless sensors. Two sessions of recordings for offline and real-time evaluation were conducted, with 30 rounds and 15 rounds, respectively. Decoding was performed using a mode-specific, phase-dependent classifier. The method was implemented in LocoD, an existing open-source platform, allowing for further development by the community and allowing easy comparison between different classification algorithms. The evaluation of the platform and prediction algorithm relies on quantifying the transition error, signifying instances where the algorithm falls short in predicting shifts between different walking surfaces.
resultsIn this study, a participant exhibited an average error as low as 1.2%, indicating precise predictions. Conversely, the highest average error was found at 23% in a different participant. This variation could be the result of factors related to the amputation such as residual limb length, remaining muscles, and the surgical technique used while performing the amputation, as well as differences in performing the movements. On average, offline classification resulted in a mean error of 5.7%, while the corresponding mean error during online (real-time) evaluation was 11.6%.
conclusionOur findings suggest that myoelectric signals can be potentially used in the control of prosthetic legs for individuals with short residual limbs with osseointegrated implants. Further research into understanding and compensating for variations in the locomotion detection accuracy for different participants is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.