ArticleMicrobial cell factories2025
Harnessing an anti-CRISPR protein for powering CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in undomesticated Bacillus strains.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical limitations of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in bacteria: challenges and future directions.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Development of a Tool for High-Efficiency, Markerless and Iterative Genome Editing in Shouchella clausii.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWild-type Bacillus strains have significant industrial and medical value, but their effective utilization often requires strain improvement. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has become the primary tool for genome editing, allowing precise introduction of desired mutations at specific chromosomal locations. However, the practical application of CRISPR/Cas9 in most wild-type Bacillus strains remains challenging due to cellular toxicity resulting from Cas9/sgRNA activity. Therefore, controlling Cas9 toxicity is essential for the widespread application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in wild-type Bacillus strains.
resultsWe employed AcrIIA4, an anti-CRISPR protein that inhibits the Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex from interacting with DNA, to mitigate Cas9/sgRNA-mediated toxicity, thereby enabling CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in wild-type strains. The newly constructed CRISPR/anti-CRISPR (CAC) plasmids harbor both cas9 and acrIIA4 genes controlled by the P
conclusionsIn this study, we developed a CAC system that utilizes the anti-CRISPR protein AcrIIA4 to reduce Cas9/sgRNA-mediated toxicity in Bacillus strains. This system enables precise control of AcrIIA4 and Cas9 expression through inducers, significantly enhancing the efficiency of transformation and genome editing in wild-type Bacillus strains. Therefore, the CAC system stands as a powerful tool to facilitate genome editing in diverse wild-type Bacillus species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.