ReviewTransplantation2025
Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease, Part 1: How Preclinical Models Shape Our Understanding of Biology and Pave the Way for Future Therapeutic Interventions.
Review in Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Immune dynamics and predictive factors for chronic graft versus host disease following haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- Advances in graft-versus-host disease: emerging therapeutic strategies, biomarker discoveries, and innovative treatment approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading cause of nonrelapse morbidity and mortality post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Murine cGVHD models have laid the groundwork for the clinical translation of multiple recently Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for second- and third-line treatments of patients with cGVHD. However, not all patients respond to these therapies, and in those that do, responses are often partial or transient. Significant gaps remain in our understanding of cGVHD biology, which limits our ability to develop additional and more precise therapeutics that can be used alone or in combination for treating patients with cGVHD. Current and future preclinical investigations focusing on disease mechanisms that are as yet unexplored will elucidate new pathways to be exploited for improving the outcomes of patients with cGVHD. This review focuses on preclinical data derived from cGVHD animal models with particular emphases on (1) cGVHD basic biology; (2) the utility of integrating preclinical data from mouse models and human samples for clinical translation; and (3) burgeoning areas of preclinical investigation which hold future therapeutic potential, including targeting of fibrosis, lymphocyte metabolism, and cellular therapies for cGVHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.