ArticleeLife2025
CellSeg3D, Self-supervised 3D cell segmentation for fluorescence microscopy.
Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated segmentation of neurons and spinal cord structures in immunofluorescence images using SpineDL.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- NucVerse3D: generalizable 3D nuclear instance segmentation across heterogeneous microscopy modalities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- NucleoNet and DropNet: Generalist deep learning models for instance segmentation of nuclei and lipid droplets from electron microscopy images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Organelle Segmentation in Live-Cell Imaging.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the complex three-dimensional structure of cells is crucial across many disciplines in biology and especially in neuroscience. Here, we introduce a set of models including a 3D transformer (SwinUNetR) and a novel 3D self-supervised learning method (WNet3D) designed to address the inherent complexity of generating 3D ground truth data and quantifying nuclei in 3D volumes. We developed a Python package called CellSeg3D that provides access to these models in Jupyter Notebooks and in a napari GUI plugin. Recognizing the scarcity of high-quality 3D ground truth data, we created a fully human-annotated mesoSPIM dataset to advance evaluation and benchmarking in the field. To assess model performance, we benchmarked our approach across four diverse datasets: the newly developed mesoSPIM dataset, a 3D platynereis-ISH-Nuclei confocal dataset, a separate 3D Platynereis-Nuclei light-sheet dataset, and a challenging and densely packed Mouse-Skull-Nuclei confocal dataset. We demonstrate that our self-supervised model, WNet3D - trained without any ground truth labels - achieves performance on par with state-of-the-art supervised methods, paving the way for broader applications in label-scarce biological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.