ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Large Variation in Adherence to Diagnostic Guidelines in Hypertension Management in Swedish Primary Healthcare.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High blood pressure (BP) is a frequent cause for visits to primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Sweden. Guidelines on methods for BP measurements for diagnosis of hypertension have recently been updated. We aimed to study adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management and evaluate whether adherence to guidelines was related to organizational or sociodemographic characteristics. Interviews with representatives from 76 randomly selected PHCCs from eight regions in Sweden were conducted. PHCCs' use of 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM) and BP measurements in both arms for the diagnosis of hypertension were chosen as proxy markers for adherence to diagnostic guidelines. An adherence index was created as a composite score of these diagnostic methods. The proportion of PHCCs stating they "often use" ABPM and HBPM were 13.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and 57.3% stated they performed BP measurements in both arms. Two PHCCs did not use ABPM, HBPM or BP measurements in both arms to diagnose hypertension. None of the organizational or sociodemographic characteristics (number of listed patients, Care Need Index (CNI), geographical location, ownership, investigation primarily led by doctor/nurse, dedicated team management, special training for hypertension and local routines) were associated with the adherence index. This study shows that adherence to diagnostic guidelines vary largely between PHCCs. No organizational characteristic, not even team-based management, was associated with adherence to diagnostic guidelines. The variation raises questions about inequity healthcare and novel strategies that may be needed to improve PHCCs' adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: 263351 [www.researchweb.org].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.