ReviewHealth science reports2025
Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement in Patients With Moderate to Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Clinical Outcomes and Echocardiographic Indices.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07516444 (VDyne Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Study to Evaluate Safety and Clinical Efficacy in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
VDyne Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Study to Evaluate Safety and Clinical Efficacy in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair versus tricuspid valve replacement versus optimal medical therapy in moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Case Report: Successful transcatheter repair of left ventricle-right atrium connection following ventricular septal defect surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a prevalent, often overlooked condition linked to significant morbidity and mortality in older adults. Due to the high risks associated with conventional surgery, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has emerged as a less invasive alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes and echocardiographic indices of TTVR. Methods: Five databases were searched systematically, and eligible studies included patients with moderate or severe TR who underwent TTVR. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies and the JBI checklist for case series. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of TTVR on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and echocardiographic parameters. Results: Twenty-one studies with 643 patients (mean age 75.8 years, 70.76% female) reported a 94% technical success rate for TTVR (95% CI: 91-96%). 30-day mortality was 4% (95% CI: 2-6%) and 1-year mortality was 9% (95% CI: 6%-13%). Significant improvements were noted in TR severity (OR = 0.0013, 95% CI: 0.0006-0.0027, Conclusion: TTVR presents a promising treatment alternative for high-risk patients with severe TR, demonstrating high technical success, favorable clinical outcomes, and significant echocardiographic improvements. While the procedure is associated with low in-hospital and 1-year mortality, further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and optimize patient selection for this emerging therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.