ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Patient Perspectives on Reproductive Health in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Exploring Disease Manifestations, Quality of Life, and the Role of Social Support.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-reported reproductive concerns and care needs among women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Between Visible Marks and Invisible Pain: A Qualitative Study of Multi-Layered Stigma Among Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction/Aim: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition that can cause a wide range of clinical symptoms, resulting in a substantial burden on its patients. This study examines how disease symptoms, quality of life, and social support affect SLE patients' reproductive health perspectives. Methods: This cross-sectional study included all consecutive female SLE patients at a single-provider rheumatology clinic. Sixty-six patients provided data from September 2023 to March 2024. MSPSS, SLEDAI and WHOQOL-BREF scores were used to test patients perceived social support, disease activity and quality of life, respectively. Results: The mean age of the study population was 39.62 ± 15.40 years. Constitutional symptoms were the most common disease manifestations (85.8%), followed by mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal symptoms (83.3% each). The mean SLEDAI score was 7.95 ± 9.29. Among previously married patients, 53.0% (n =35) had at least one child, and 81.0% of them experienced at least one pregnancy-related complication. Notably, 69.2% of patients were uncertain about the impact of SLE on fertility, and 91.0% had never received reproductive health counseling. Patients who were consulted by their Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYNs) doctors had significantly higher WHOQOL-BREF physical health (32.1 vs 10.3, P-value =0.036) and higher psychological health scores (63.2 vs 35.1, P-value =0.012). Conclusion: SLE profoundly influences patients' physical, psychological, and social well-being, with a notable impact on reproductive health. Collaboration among OBGYNs and Rheumatologists to create a culturally sensitive method to address common misconceptions about SLE and infertility is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.