Evidence mapPaperPMID 40552103Full record

ReviewJournal of extracellular biology2025

Detection and Isolation of Tissue-Specific Extracellular Vesicles From the Blood.

Lauren Newman, Andrew Rowland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of extracellular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren NewmanCollege of Medicine and Public Health Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3303-1666
Andrew RowlandCollege of Medicine and Public Health Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized, membrane-bound particles released by virtually all cell types, serving as messengers within tissues and across organs via the bloodstream. EVs encapsulate diverse molecular cargo that reflects the phenotypic state of their originating cells, making them promising candidates for liquid biopsy applications. However, the heterogeneity of circulating EVs, comprising particles from various cell types and non-vesicular entities like lipoproteins, poses significant challenges for isolating tissue-specific EV populations. This review examines current methodologies for detecting and isolating tissue-specific EVs from blood, focusing on immunoaffinity capture (IAC) strategies that leverage surface marker expression for specificity. Key considerations, including the selection and validation of markers, are discussed alongside advances in EV subtyping and isolation protocols. Challenges such as marker cross-reactivity, EV biogenesis and transport dynamics are highlighted to underscore the complexity of achieving clinical utility. By providing an overview of validated tissue-specific markers and isolation techniques, this review aims to facilitate the development of EV-based biomarkers with enhanced specificity and sensitivity, enabling minimally invasive monitoring of organ function and disease.

Indexed as

cell originEV subtypesextracellular vesiclesimmunoaffinity isolationorgan‐derivedtissue‐specific

Identifiers

PMID40552103
PMCPMC12183346

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.