ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Efficacy of different polypill combinations for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-printed polypills for personalized medicine and precision oral drug delivery in pharmaceutical practice: A review.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy as a Strategy to Improve Antidiabetic Medication Adherence in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Perceived Diabetes Burden, Clinical Care Gap, and Intent to Prescribe a Diabetes Polypill to Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and polypills have established efficacy in preventing poor outcomes. However, evidence on the optimal polypill combination is lacking. The objective of the study is to estimate the optimal polypill combination that maximizes cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from January 1, 1960, to March 30, 2025. Studies that provided data on the association between polypill and cardiovascular outcomes were included. We estimated the effect of various polypill combinations by random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modification in the association between polypill combinations and cardiovascular outcomes. Results: Thirty studies comprising 35,833 individuals met the inclusion criteria from 6 continents. The estimated pooled effects of polypill use on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were RR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98), respectively. The pooled relative risk of MACE outcome was 21% lower in combination of 4 or more pills [0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.15), Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, polypills with 3 cardiovascular classes that contain a high-intensity statins, aspirin and RAAS inhibitors appeared to have greater reduction in MACE outcomes. The presence of a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker in the polypill was associated with greater reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.