Evidence mapPaperPMID 40552187Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Efficacy of different polypill combinations for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Habib Yazgi, Shivani Mattikalli, Brian Fang, Hannah Heselton, Paddy Ssentongo, Michael Farbaniec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy as a Strategy to Improve Antidiabetic Medication Adherence in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Habib Yazgi *Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.
Shivani Mattikalli *Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.
Brian FangDepartment of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.
Hannah HeseltonDepartment of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.
Paddy SsentongoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.
Michael FarbaniecDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and polypills have established efficacy in preventing poor outcomes. However, evidence on the optimal polypill combination is lacking. The objective of the study is to estimate the optimal polypill combination that maximizes cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from January 1, 1960, to March 30, 2025. Studies that provided data on the association between polypill and cardiovascular outcomes were included. We estimated the effect of various polypill combinations by random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modification in the association between polypill combinations and cardiovascular outcomes. Results: Thirty studies comprising 35,833 individuals met the inclusion criteria from 6 continents. The estimated pooled effects of polypill use on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were RR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98), respectively. The pooled relative risk of MACE outcome was 21% lower in combination of 4 or more pills [0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.15), Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, polypills with 3 cardiovascular classes that contain a high-intensity statins, aspirin and RAAS inhibitors appeared to have greater reduction in MACE outcomes. The presence of a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker in the polypill was associated with greater reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasemajor adverse cardiac eventsmeta-analysesmortalitypolypill

Identifiers

PMID40552187
PMCPMC12183251

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.