ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Is Retail Extra Virgin Olive Oil Truly Extra Virgin? Consumer Perceptions Versus Analytical Quality Across Price Ranges.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemesthetic Perception in Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Olive Ripening Stage: A Sensory Perspective.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of Consumer Trends and the Bioactive Content of Extra Virgin Olive Oil: Comparative Insights into Trademarked and Local Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is Retail Extra Virgin Olive Oil Truly Extra Virgin? Consumer Perceptions Versus Analytical Quality Across Price Ranges.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, extra virgin olive oil demand has grown globally. The increasing popularity has led to a highly diversified commercial offer: supermarkets and discounters present a wide variety of brands and price ranges. However, price does not always correlate with quality, and label information can often mislead consumers. Understanding consumer preferences, knowledge, and drivers of perceived quality is crucial for maintaining trust in the extra virgin olive oil sector. This study investigates the alignment between consumers' expectations based on label information and the actual quality of extra virgin olive oils through a commercial and chemical analytical screening. The research objectives included a consumer survey to identify purchasing drivers, consumption habits, and knowledge of quality standards; a commercial survey on the extra virgin olive oil available in different stores, assessing brand, price variability, and transparency of information; and chemical and sensory analyses on selected extra virgin olive oils of different price ranges to evaluate whether the declared quality reflects the actual quality. The results showed significant inconsistencies in quality: although all oils were labeled as extra virgin olive oil, many medium- and low-priced samples presented sensory defects that EU regulations prohibit for extra virgin olive oil. Notably, oils with more detailed and transparent labeling, such as harvest year, cultivar, and extraction method, tended to perform better in chemical and sensory analyses, regardless of price. This suggests that consumers may better assess quality by scrutinizing label information rather than relying solely on price, highlighting the practical importance of comprehensive labeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.