Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552389›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Religious Hospitals and Poorer Health Outcomes: A Case Study Using Hospital Performance Ratings.

Justin Huft, Katrina Guardino

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin HuftUniversity of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2655-2519
Katrina GuardinoDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid state and federal initiatives to bolster healthcare practitioners' religious freedom, the impact of hospital religious affiliations on health outcomes has become a pertinent question. Despite the significance of this issue, there appears to be a lack of research examining the potential differences in health outcomes between religiously affiliated and secular hospitals. Addressing this gap, our exploratory study utilizes health outcome data from 291 California hospitals from 2016 to 2020. We evaluate health outcomes across a spectrum of interventions and events, accounting for variables such as the category of health condition (eg, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, pancreatic). We find evidence that hospital funding partially moderates the relationship between religious hospitals and health outcomes. While there are no differences in health outcomes between religious and secular hospitals at the lowest levels of revenue, as revenue increases, religious hospitals have more adverse health outcomes than their secular hospital counterparts. These results highlight the need for further investigation into how institutional priorities and resource allocation in religious hospitals may affect patient care, particularly as hospital revenue increases.

Indexed as

Hospitals, ReligiousOutcome Assessment, Health CareCaliforniaHumansOrganizational Case Studieshealthcarehealth outcomeshospitalsreligious hospitalssecular hospitals

Identifiers

PMID40552389
PMCPMC12188053

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.