ReviewAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
The Search for Love in Human Evolution: Primate Social Bonds and a New Science of Emotion.
Review in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Romantic love as regulatory co-option of maternal-bonding circuitry: a testable genetic account.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Search for Love in Human Evolution: Primate Social Bonds and a New Science of Emotion.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Love defines the human experience but often defies scientific study. Biological anthropologists flirt with the topic of love by studying monogamy and affiliative relationships. The interest in monogamy, I argue, is misplaced. But the interest in affiliative relationships is productive and deserves greater theoretical and methodological innovation. Social bonds have been carefully described for decades by primatologists, but I suggest that we still lack conceptual clarity and the crucial data needed to distinguish them from other types of relationships. A deeper understanding of social bonds, and pair bonds in particular, will be possible through the application of new methods to study affective states, or "emotions," in wild primates and other animals. By studying the emotions that underly various relationships, we will make progress toward answering prevailing questions about the origins and future of love, romance, and friendship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.