ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025
Sustainable forest soil management for remediation of heavy metals contamination: integrating technologies and ecosystem health.
Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Belowground and Aboveground Responses to Mixed Metal Contamination in Native Central European Trees in Relation to the Species-Specific Autecology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-term organic nutrient management in tomato enhances yield, quality, profitability, and soil health in a semi-arid conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative chromium adsorptive capacity of different low-cost materials using fixed bed column.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to its persistence and non-biodegradability, heavy metal pollution in forest soils poses an ecological disaster and a severe environmental concern, necessitating sustainable mitigation solutions. Forest soils exhibit physicochemical and biological properties, such as high organic matter content, abundant clay minerals, and diverse microbial interactions, which facilitate key processes such as adsorption, precipitation, and microbial-mediated immobilization of heavy metals. These attributes collectively enhance their capacity for sustainable remediation. Despite extensive research efforts in environmental remediation, there remains a gap in synthesizing the diverse approaches and technologies used for addressing forest soil contamination by heavy metals. Hence, this review aims to bridge this gap by consolidating existing knowledge and highlighting areas that require further investigation by providing an overview of research progress, prospects, and trends in soil remediation of heavy metal contamination. We discuss various remediation methods (e.g., phytoremediation, microbial interactions, and soil amendments), evaluating their effectiveness in reducing heavy metal concentrations and their impact on ecosystem health. A detailed analysis of these methods is presented, including their limitations, applicability, and the need to consider site-specific factors, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and long-term efficacy. Additionally, we stress the importance of continuous innovation and collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to develop multidisciplinary, technology-driven solutions for restoring contaminated soils and safeguarding human and ecosystem health. By integrating multidisciplinary approaches and leveraging emerging technologies, sustainable solutions can be developed to restore contaminated soils and protect human health and ecosystems. Future research should focus on exploring the long-term impacts of forest soil management practices on heavy metal bioavailability and mobility, as well as optimizing existing techniques, exploring novel approaches, assessing ecosystem responses, and integrating forest soil management into broader environmental restoration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40553236What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.