Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553257›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025

Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Therapeutic Strategies Based on Stem Cells.

Isai Mathivanan, Enzmann Volker, Keerthana Thyagarajan, Anitha Thirugnanasambantham Sivasubramanian, Kamaraj Raju, Annadurai Thangaraj

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isai MathivananDepartment of Zoology, Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India.
Enzmann VolkerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Keerthana ThyagarajanAravind Medical Research Foundation, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India.
Anitha Thirugnanasambantham SivasubramanianDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India.
Kamaraj RajuDepartment of Biotechnology, Rathinam College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, 641021, Tamil Nadu, India.
Annadurai ThangarajCentre for Excellence in Nanobio Translational Research, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, University College of Engineering, Anna University- BIT Campus, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India. annadurai.t@aubit.edu.in.ORCID 0000-0001-7125-2289

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/HRD/35/02/2006 dated 30/03/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss among the elderly in developed countries, manifesting in two primary forms: neovascular (wet) AMD and non-neovascular (dry) AMD. Current treatments, such as anti-VEGF therapy, offer limited efficacy, particularly for dry AMD, highlighting the urgent need for alternative strategies. Advancements in contemporary treatment strategies for these eye conditions are a pressing medical concern. Stem cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising approach for retinal regeneration due to their capacity for self-renewal and differentiation into retinal cell types, including retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells and photoreceptors, two key cell populations damaged in AMD. Among the various sources, pluripotent stem cells such as human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) show significant potential in generating functional RPE cells and restoring retinal architecture and function. Preclinical and early clinical studies have demonstrated promising outcomes, including improved visual acuity and anatomical integration. However, challenges such as immune rejection, tumorigenicity, limited long-term integration, and ethical concerns continue to impede clinical translation. This review critically evaluates current stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for AMD, including advances in mesenchymal stem cells, retinal organoids, and combinatorial approaches with gene and nanotherapy. Furthermore, this review outlines the translational bottlenecks and future directions required to advance these therapies toward clinical application.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsRetinal Pigment EpitheliumAge-related macular degenerationCell replacement therapyClinical trialsEmbryonic stem cellsInduced pluripotent stem cellsMesenchymal stem cellsRegenerative ophthalmologyRetinal organoidsRetinal pigment epitheliumStem cell therapy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.