ArticlePloS one2025
Rethinking HIV care for youth: Insights from qualitative research with youth in Chad.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The successful scaling-up of antiretroviral therapy globally has many lessons for advancing universal health coverage: progress at risk.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Optimising HIV and related SRH service delivery for adolescents and young adults: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Optimising adolescents and young adults' utilisation of sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in Chad: a sensemaking approach.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: Enhancing HIV care pathways for young key populations in Chad.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Youth ages 15-24 years are significantly impacted by the HIV/AIDS epidemic, representing approximately 37% of new infections globally. This demographic is especially vulnerable in sub-Saharan Africa, where over 80% of HIV-positive youth reside. In Chad, youth face barriers to effective HIV care, including high prevalence rates, particularly among young women, and substantial disparities across regions. Despite overall reductions in new HIV infections, youth remain disproportionately affected, necessitating targeted interventions to improve HIV care outcomes. This study represents a secondary data analysis derived from a parent study that employed a grounded theory design to develop theory inductively. The secondary analysis aimed to generate an in-depth understanding of the pathways to care for youth in Chad, exploring barriers and facilitators across the care continuum, from diagnosis to antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Data were collected through focus group discussions with 52 youth and 48 service providers, including healthcare workers and community actors. Data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed assisted with ATLAS.ti software (Version 7.6.3). Youth identified barriers such as financial constraints, logistical challenges, and fear of stigma, while facilitators included peer support and specialized HIV care facilities. Healthcare workers emphasized the critical role of psychosocial counseling and confidentiality in facilitating youth engagement with HIV services. They also highlighted critical challenges, including the lack of accessible and youth-friendly services, and the need for continuous education to reduce stigma. The findings underscore the importance of tailored, youth-friendly interventions that address these challenges, foster supportive environments, and integrate youth and provider perspectives. We recommend redesigning healthcare services to improve accessibility, reduce stigma, and provide continuous psychosocial support, ultimately enhancing the HIV care continuum for youth in Chad and similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.