ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Inheritance bias of deletion-harbouring mtDNA in yeast: The role of copy number and intracellular selection.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of a Collection of Natural Oleogenic Yeasts to Identify Promising Producers of Food Oil Analogues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial Genome Instability inBiology · 2024Article
- Flow-cytometry reveals mitochondrial DNA accumulation inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During sexual reproduction, fungi usually inherit mtDNA from both parents, however, the distribution of the mtDNA in the progeny can be biased toward some mtDNA variants. For example, crossing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain carrying wild type (rho+) mtDNA with the strain carrying mutant mtDNA variant with a large deletion (rho-) can produce up to 99-100% of rho- diploid progeny. Two factors could contribute to this phenomenon. First, rho- cells may accumulate more copies of mtDNA molecules per cell than wild-type cells, making rho- mtDNA the prevalent mtDNA molecule in zygotes. This consequently leads to a high portion of rho- diploid cells in the offspring. Second, rho- mtDNA may have a competitive advantage within heteroplasmic cells, and therefore could displace rho+ mtDNA in a series of generations, regardless of their initial ratio. To assess the contribution of these factors, we investigated the genotypes and phenotypes of twenty two rho- yeast strains. We found that indeed rho- cells have a higher mtDNA copy number per cell than rho+ strains. Using an in silico modelling of mtDNA selection and random drift in heteroplasmic yeast cells, we assessed the intracellular fitness of mutant mtDNA variants. Our model indicates that both higher copy numbers and intracellular fitness advantage of the rho- mtDNA contribute to the biased inheritance of rho- mtDNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.