ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-world data on clinical outcomes and validation of prognostic models for angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a multicentric retrospective study in Southern China.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unraveling the many faces of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: clinical, pathological, and molecular heterogeneity.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to elucidate the treatment outcomes and prognosis of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) patients in a real-world setting. Objectives: The clinical efficacy of new drug applications was evaluated, alongside the predictive accuracy of prognostic models, to inform future research. Methods: In this study, 82.9% of patients received a CHOP-like regimen, while 36.4% also received chidamide. We assessed the prognostic models' predictive power using the Cox proportional hazards model and concordance index (C-index). Results: The median age of the patients in this study was 62.0 years, with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 36.1% and 60.3%, respectively. Complete response (CR) rates in first-line treatments were 21.6% for the chidamide-containing group and 28.1% for the chidamide-free group. The AITL scores, PIAI scores, and Chinese AITL scores demonstrated superior C-index values, with the Chinese AITL score providing the most distinct risk stratification. Advanced age (over 70 years), bone marrow involvement, and CD7 negativity were identified as significant prognostic factors associated with poorer PFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. A novel prognostic model, the South China AITL Score, was constructed by combining these three factors, stratifying patients into low-risk and high-risk groups, with 5-year PFS rates of 81.5% and 34.6%, respectively. This model was successfully validated in an independent cohort. Conclusions: The prognosis of AITL in real-world settings is poor, and the addition of chidamide did not show improvement in remission rates or survival. Our novel prognostic model, along with the Chinese AITL score, may enhance the identification of Chinese patients at varying risks for chemotherapy. Furthermore, the pathological marker CD7 is anticipated to emerge as a significant biomarker for the prognostic evaluation of AITL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.