Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556778›Full record

ReviewACS bio & med chem Au2025

From Biophysics to Biomedical Physics.

Karim Almahayni, Jana Bachir Salvador, Dijo Moonnukandathil Jospeh, Nazlican Yürekli, Stephanie Möllmert, Leonhard Möckl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS bio & med chem Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karim AlmahayniMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-4327
Jana Bachir SalvadorMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6849-2974
Dijo Moonnukandathil JospehMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2700-9717
Nazlican YürekliMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Stephanie MöllmertMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Leonhard MöcklMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-886X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intersection of physics and medicine has long been a fertile ground for innovation, with advances in one field driving breakthroughs in the other. In recent years, the emergence of modern biophysical techniques has provided a toolbox for understanding complex physiological processes across scales. These tools have the potential to revolutionize medical practice, from diagnosis to therapy. However, despite this immense potential, the path from basic biophysical research to clinical translation remains fraught with challenges. This review aims to highlight emerging biophysical tools and their potential applications in medical physics, with a focus on how these innovations can be translated into clinical solutions. We outline a strategic roadmap for bridging the gap between cutting-edge biophysics research and its effective integration into clinical settings, ensuring that these technologies can meaningfully transform patient care.

Indexed as

BiophysicsClinical biologyMechanical phenotypingMedicineMicroscopySuper-resolution microscopyTranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID40556778
PMCPMC12183599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.