Evidence mapPaperPMID 40557342Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Federated Learning for Predicting Major Postoperative Complications.

Yuanfang Ren, Yonggi Park, Benjamin Shickel, Ziyuan Guan, Ayush Patel, Yingbo Ma, Zhenhong Hu, Jeremy A Balch, Tyler J Loftus, Parisa Rashidi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuanfang RenFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Yonggi ParkFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Benjamin ShickelFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Ziyuan GuanFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Ayush PatelFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Yingbo MaFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Zhenhong HuFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Jeremy A BalchFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Tyler J LoftusFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Parisa RashidiFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Tezcan Ozrazgat-BaslantiFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Azra BihoracFrom the Intelligent Clinical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Funding

Explainable, Fair, Reproducible and Collaborative Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessment (XAI-IDEALIST)R01GM110240 · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · 2025 to 2025
$513k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a robust model to accurately predict the risk of postoperative complications using clinical data from multiple institutions while ensuring data privacy. Background: Building accurate, artificial intelligence models to predict postoperative complications relies on accessibility of large-scale and diverse datasets, often restricted by privacy concerns. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients admitted to University of Florida Health (UFH) hospitals in Gainesville (GNV) (n = 79,850) and Jacksonville (JAX) (n = 28,636) for all inpatient major surgical procedures. We developed federated learning models to predict 9 major postoperative complications and compared them with both local models trained on a single site and central models trained on a pooled dataset from 2 hospitals. Results: Our best-federated learning models using preoperative features achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values with 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.80 (95% CI, 0.79-0.80) for wound complications to 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91) for prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay at UFH GNV. At UFH JAX, these values ranged from 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.72) for wound complications to 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92) for in-hospital mortality. Federated learning models achieved comparable discrimination to central models for all outcomes, except prolonged ICU stay, where the performance of the federated learning model was slightly better at UFH GNV and slightly worse at UFH JAX. Our federated learning models obtained comparable performance to the best local models. Conclusions: We show federated learning to be a useful tool to train robust postoperative outcome prediction models from large-scale data across 2 hospitals.

Indexed as

data privacyelectronic health recordsfederated learningmajor surgerypostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID40557342
PMCPMC12185077

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.