ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Myelofibrosis: Treatment Options After Ruxolitinib Failure.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07750574 (A Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Oral Flonoltinib Maleate in Patients With JAK Inhibitor Treatment-Naïve or Resistant Myelofibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Oral Flonoltinib Maleate in Patients With JAK Inhibitor Treatment-Naïve or Resistant Myelofibrosis
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy for patients with myelofibrosis, its applicability is limited both by the high morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure and by the fact that only a minority of patients are eligible due to age or comorbidities. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is the standard first-line therapy for intermediate- and high-risk MF, offering symptom relief and splenic volume reduction but lacking a clear survival benefit. Its use may be limited by hematologic toxicities, increased infection risk, and an inability to prevent disease progression. Ruxolitinib failure remains a significant clinical challenge, with resistance mechanisms not fully elucidated. The approval of other JAK inhibitors-fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib-has expanded treatment options, particularly for patients with cytopenias or transfusion dependence. Moreover, many other targeted agents are in development in clinical trials, as monotherapy or in combination with ruxolitinib. This review provides an update on the use of JAK inhibitors and novel agents, with a focus on treatment options for ruxolitinib-resistant or refractory patients. As therapeutic strategies evolve, optimizing treatment sequencing and incorporating next-generation sequencing will be critical for improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.