ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biomimetic Design and Assessment via Microenvironmental Testing: From Food Packaging Biomaterials to Implantable Medical Devices.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Dynamic Biomimetic Biomaterials: Temporal Coupling of Flavonoid-Induced Cellular Responses and 3D-Printed PLA Scaffold Evolution.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structure-Property Evolution of Cubic and Gyroid PLA Scaffolds During In Vitro Degradation Under Physiologically Relevant Conditions.Polymers · 2026Article
- Materials of care: Engineering the future of the ICU.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Article
- Influence of Scaffold Structure and Biomimetic Properties on Adipose Stem Cell Homing in Personalized Reconstructive Medicine.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomaterials and biomedical devices interact with the human body at different levels. At one end of the spectrum, medical devices in contact with tissue pose risks depending on whether they are deployed on the skin or implanted. On the other hand, food packaging and associated material technologies must also be biocompatible to prevent the transfer of harmful molecules and contamination of food, which could impact human health. These seemingly unlinked domains converge into a shared need for the elaboration of new laboratory evaluation protocols that consider recent advances in biomaterials and biodevices, coupled with increasing legal restrictions on the use of animal models. Here, we aim to select and prescribe physiologically relevant microenvironment conditions for biocompatibility testing of novel biomaterials and biodevices. Our discussion spans (1) the development of testing protocols according to material classes, (2) current legislation and standards, and (3) the preparation of biomimetic setups that replicate the microenvironment, with a focus on the multidisciplinary dimension of such studies. Testing spans several characterization domains, beginning with chemical properties, followed by mechanical integrity and, finally, biological response. Biomimetic testing conditions typically include temperature fluctuations, humidity, mechanical stress and loading, exposure to body fluids, and interaction with multifaceted biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.