ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comprehensive Stiffness Modeling and Evaluation of an Orthopedic Surgical Robot for Enhanced Cutting Operation Performance.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted laser osteotomy system based on dose-effect model-guided feedforward control.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents an integrated stiffness modeling and evaluation framework for an orthopedic surgical robot, aiming to enhance cutting accuracy and operational stability. A comprehensive stiffness model is developed, incorporating the stiffness of the end-effector, cutting tool, and force sensor. End-effector stiffness is computed using the virtual joint method based on the Jacobian matrix, enabling accurate analysis of stiffness distribution within the robot's workspace. Joint stiffness is experimentally identified through laser tracker-based displacement measurements under controlled loads and calculated using a least-squares method. The results show displacement errors below 0.3 mm and joint stiffness estimation errors under 1.5%, with values more consistent and stable than those reported for typical surgical robots. Simulation studies reveal spatial variations in operational stiffness, identifying zones of low stiffness and excessive stiffness. Compared to prior studies where stiffness varied over 50%, the proposed model exhibits superior uniformity. Experimental validation confirms model fidelity, with prediction errors generally below 5%. Cutting experiments on porcine femurs demonstrate real-world applicability, achieving average stiffness prediction errors below 3%, and under 1% in key directions. The model supports stiffness-aware trajectory planning and control, reducing cutting deviation by up to 10% and improving workspace stiffness stability by 30%. This research offers a validated, high-accuracy approach to stiffness modeling for surgical robots, bridging the gap between simulation and clinical application, and providing a foundation for safer, more precise robotic orthopedic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.