Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558668›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Miranda Holmes, Alexander N J White, Luke J Rogers, Piroze M Davierwala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miranda HolmesDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Alexander N J WhiteDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Luke J RogersDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6240-0120
Piroze M DavierwalaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MI-CABG) has emerged as a transformative approach to coronary revascularization, offering reduced morbidity, faster recovery and improved cosmesis compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Performed without full sternotomy and commonly without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), MI-CABG encompasses a variety of techniques. These procedures present unique challenges for the anesthesiologist, necessitating a tailored perioperative strategy. This review explores the anesthetic management of MI-CABG, focusing on preoperative assessment, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative care. Preoperative evaluation emphasizes cardiac, respiratory, and vascular considerations, including suitability for one-lung ventilation (OLV) and the impact of comorbidities. Intraoperatively, anesthesiologists must manage hemodynamic instability, ensure effective OLV, and maintain normothermia. Postoperative strategies prioritize multimodal analgesia, early extubation, and rapid mobilization to leverage the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. By integrating surgical and anesthetic perspectives, this review underscores the anesthesiologist's pivotal role in navigating the physiological demands of MI-CABG. As techniques evolve and experience grows, a comprehensive understanding of these principles will enhance the safety and efficacy of MI-CABG, making it a viable option for an expanding patient population.

Indexed as

anesthesiologycardiac surgerycoronary artery bypass graftingminimally invasive

Identifiers

PMID40558668
PMCPMC12194757

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.