ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Platelets Image Classification Through Data Augmentation: A Comparative Study of Traditional Imaging Augmentation and GAN-Based Synthetic Data Generation Techniques Using CNNs.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Platelets play a crucial role in diagnosing and detecting various diseases, influencing the progression of conditions and guiding treatment options. Accurate identification and classification of platelets are essential for these purposes. The present study aims to create a synthetic database of platelet images using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and validate its effectiveness by comparing it with datasets of increasing sizes generated through traditional augmentation techniques. Starting from an initial dataset of 71 platelet images, the dataset was expanded to 141 images (Level 1) using random oversampling and basic transformations and further to 1463 images (Level 2) through extensive augmentation (rotation, shear, zoom). Additionally, a synthetic dataset of 300 images was generated using a Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP). Eight pre-trained deep learning models (DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201, VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, and AlexNet) and two custom CNNs were evaluated across these datasets. Performance was measured using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. On the extensively augmented dataset (Level 2), InceptionV3 and InceptionResNetV2 reached 99% accuracy and 99% precision/recall/F1-score, while DenseNet201 closely followed, with 98% accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score. GAN-augmented data further improved DenseNet's performance, demonstrating the potential of GAN-generated images in enhancing platelet classification, especially where data are limited. These findings highlight the benefits of combining traditional and GAN-based augmentation techniques to improve classification performance in medical imaging tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.