Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558879›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials-A Preliminary Study.

Piotr Wróbel, Adam Piecuch, Michał Bąk, Paweł Krynicki, Jakub Adamczyk, Piotr Mojżesz, Agnieszka Kiełboń, Sylwia Wójcik, Martin Starosta, Won-Pyo Lee and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07565558 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07565558 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of SilesiaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsSocket Preservation, Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Xenograft, AllograftArmsSocket preservation with xenograft, Socket preservation with allograft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Piotr WróbelDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 15 Poniatowskiego Street, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Adam PiecuchDepartment of Histology and Cell Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 19 Jordana Str., 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.
Michał BąkPrivate Dental Practice Comfortmed, 12 Wspólna Street, 44-240 Żory, Poland.
Paweł KrynickiDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 15 Poniatowskiego Street, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0009-0002-2991-8643
Jakub AdamczykDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 15 Poniatowskiego Street, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Piotr MojżeszDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 15 Poniatowskiego Street, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Agnieszka KiełbońFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia, 75 Pułku Piechoty 1A, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland.ORCID 0009-0004-9112-1525
Sylwia WójcikDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 15 Poniatowskiego Street, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Martin StarostaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava-jih, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6843-349X
Won-Pyo LeeDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-3454
Tadeusz MorawiecDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 15 Poniatowskiego Street, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

Funding

Medical University of Silesia PCN-1-133/K/2/K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe socket preservation technique involves filling the bone defect created after tooth extraction with a bone substitute material. This helps to reduce bone resorption of the post-extraction alveolar ridge. Various types of bone substitute biomaterials are used as augmentation materials, including autogeneic, allogeneic, and xenogeneic materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in alveolar ridge dimensions and alterations of optical bone density in sockets grafted with two different biomaterials. Additionally, bone biopsies taken from the grafted sites underwent histological evaluation.

methodsThis study enrolled 10 generally healthy patients, who were divided into two equal groups. Patients in the first group were treated with an allogeneic material (BIOBank

resultsThe results showed that the allogeneic material was more effective in preserving alveolar buccal height and was probably more rapidly transformed into the patient's own bone. Sockets grafted with the xenogeneic material presented higher optical bone density after six months. Both materials presented similar effectiveness in alveolar width preservation.

conclusionsBased on the outcomes of this study, it can be concluded that both materials are suitable for the socket preservation technique. However, the dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge and the quality of the newly formed bone may vary depending on the type of biomaterial used.

Indexed as

allograftbiomaterialbone augmentationdeproteinized bovine boneextractionsocket preservation

Identifiers

PMID40558879
PMCPMC12194317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.