Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560145›Full record

ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2025

Microfluidic Systems to Mimic the Blood-Brain Barrier: from Market to Engineering Challenges and Perspectives.

Gabriela Gomes da Silva, Daniel Pereira Sacomani, Bruna Gregatti de Carvalho, Marimélia Aparecida Porcionatto, Angelo Gobbi, Renato Sousa Lima, Lucimara Gaziola de la Torre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriela Gomes da SilvaDepartment of Material and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.
Daniel Pereira SacomaniDepartment of Material and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.
Bruna Gregatti de CarvalhoDepartment of Material and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.
Marimélia Aparecida PorcionattoNational Institute of Science and Technology in Modeling Human Complex Diseases with 3D Platforms (INCT Model3D), São Paulo, São Paulo 04039-032, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-916X
Angelo GobbiBrazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.
Renato Sousa LimaBrazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-1475
Lucimara Gaziola de la TorreDepartment of Material and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8179-1160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying and understanding complex biological systems is a challenge that requires technologies that go beyond traditional cell culture methods. Among the new technologies that have been developed in recent times, blood-brain barrier-on-a-chip (BBB-on-a-chip) models are becoming popular. Due to their ability to integrate fluid flow, which is absent in traditional static models, it has been possible to create a cellular microenvironment that mimics blood vessels and blood flow. In addition, the possibility of coculturing different cell types in multicellular models allows the observation of their interactions and increases interest in these systems. With different possibilities in terms of prototyping techniques (e.g., laminate manufacturing, molding, and 3D impression), chip designs (e.g., planar and cylindrical configurations), and materials (e.g., thermoplastics, elastomers, and hydrogels), the number of publications in the BBB research field has significantly increased in the last five years. In parallel, the emergence and consolidation of several companies have made the commercialization and application of these chips possible, mainly in the pharmaceutical area, which is not yet integrated into the drug development pipeline. In this context, the present review describes the intersection between technique, market, and applications that mimic the BBB. We showed organ-on-a-chip (OoC) market growth and the collaborative research between the main OoC supplier companies and industrial collaborators. Also, we present an overview of the primary fabrication methods used in constructing the OoC systems and their application in developing the BBB models. In addition, we discussed the BBB-on-a-chip designs developed in the last five years, including their engineering aspects (such as materials, dimensions, and configuration), characterization, and challenges in mimicking the BBB.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidicsAnimalsHumansTissue EngineeringBBB-on-a-chipblood–brain barriermicrofluidicsorgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID40560145
PMCPMC12264779

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.