ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Left atrial and ventricular strain and extracellular volume fraction in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate cardiac MR (CMR) parameters, including left atrial (LA)/left ventricular (LV) volume, function, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV), in persistent and paroxysmal AF after catheter ablation and to evaluate the relationship between ECV and CMR parameters in AF patients. Participants comprised 41 patients with AF (persistent AF, n = 25; paroxysmal AF, n = 16) who underwent CMR study including cine-CMR, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR, and pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping within a week after restoration of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation and 18 matched controls. LA/LV volume and function and LV-ECV were determined by cine-CMR and T1 mapping, respectively. LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile strains (εR, εCD, and εCT) were determined by feature tracking. LV-ECV in patients with persistent AF (29.6 ± 3.2%) was significantly higher than that in controls (27.0 ± 1.9%, p < 0.01), and no significant differences were seen in ECV between the patients with persistent AF and paroxysmal AF and between patients with paroxysmal AF and controls. In patients with AF, univariate linear regression analyses showed that ECV correlated significantly with LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) (p = 0.03), εR (p = 0.01), and εCD (p = 0.005). Stepwise multivariate analysis, including LV ESVI, εR and εCD as variables, revealed that εCD was independently associated with ECV (standardized β = -0.39, p = 0.009). Patients with persistent AF had higher LV-ECV than controls. LA εCD was independently associated with increased ECV in patients with AF. These results suggest advanced LV fibrosis in patients with persistent AF and that CMR LA strain analysis can predict the severity of LV fibrosis in patients with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560334What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.