ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Influence of Salience on Neural Responses in Metaphor Processing of Chinese Children with Autism: Evidence from ERPs.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study, grounded in the Graded Salience Hypothesis (GSH), utilizes Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to explore metaphor processing mechanisms in 24 Chinese children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) aged 5-12 years, compared with 37 age-matched typically developing (TD) peers. Employing a 2 (Group: ASD vs. TD) × 2 (Sentence Type: Metaphor vs. Literal) × 2 (Salience: High vs. Low) factorial design, we examined neural responses to 48 validated Chinese sentences (balanced for high/low-salience metaphor-literal sentence contrasts) while controlling lexical complexity and syntactic structure. Through linear mixed-effects modeling, the study reveals three key findings: (1) ASD children exhibited reduced P200 amplitudes (150-250 ms) for metaphors compared to literal sentences, indicating impaired early salience-driven attention; (2) Attenuated N400 responses (300-500 ms) to both sentence types in ASD versus TD groups, reflecting context-independent semantic integration deficits; (3) No group differences in Late Positive Component (LPC) (600-1000 ms), suggesting comparable late-stage pragmatic evaluation. These results provide the first neurophysiological evidence for GSH in ASD, demonstrating that salience gradients critically modulate early metaphor processing stages. The findings highlight developmental divergence in ASD children's reliance on salience-based prioritization, offering mechanistic insights for designing metaphor comprehension interventions tailored to salience hierarchies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560340What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.