SynthesisPloS one2025
Societal attitudes and structural barriers in coaching para-athletes: A mixed-methods systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of self-efficacy and psychological well-being among coaches of athletes with and without disabilities: a comparative cross-sectional study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Age distributions in Paralympic Games Paris 2024: an analysis of 5,540 para athletes across 13 individual disciplines.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coaching athletes with disabilities is essential for promoting inclusivity and equity in sports. However, societal attitudes (e.g., stigmatization and ableism) and structural barriers (e.g., insufficient funding and limited access to adaptive equipment) persist as significant obstacles to their full participation and optimal performance. This systematic review addresses a critical gap in the existing literature by examining the complex interaction between societal and structural factors and their impact on coaching practice for athletes with disabilities. A mixed-methods approach was employed to synthesize data from 26 studies sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar. By integrating both qualitative and quantitative evidence, this review explores how societal biases and resource limitations converge to create systemic challenges that hinder coaching effectiveness. This review indicates that societal perceptions, including ableism and underestimation of athletic potential, in conjunction with structural barriers, such as inadequate facilities and funding, significantly undermine the effectiveness of coaching practices. Moreover, the findings emphasize the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in coach education and policy implementation with a particular focus on improving accessibility and ensuring the equitable distribution of resources. Ultimately, the evidence suggests that addressing these interconnected barriers is essential for fostering a more inclusive and equitable coaching environment for athletes with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.