ArticlePloS one2025
Statin adherence improves with age and subsequent treatment sequences: A retrospective cohort study using Proportion of Days Covered (PDC).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDyslipidaemia is a key risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), necessitating effective statin therapy. Despite statins' proven safety and efficacy, adherence remains suboptimal, with significant gaps between clinical practice and guideline recommendations.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analysed anonymized health administrative claims data from six employee health funds in the Czech Republic, covering approximately 40% of the insured population from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. We identified statin-incident as well as prevalent cohort of patients. Adherence to statin therapy was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) metric, with factors such as age, gender, sequence of use, and treatment intensity considered as modifiers.
resultsAmong the statin-prevalent cohort (SP, n = 890,180), 83.5% achieved a PDC ≥ 50%, and 61.0% reached a PDC ≥ 80%. In the statin-incident cohort (SI, n = 287,871), a clear trend of increasing adherence with age and medication sequence was observed: in adults aged 18-39 median PDC rose from 84.1% (IQR: 57-100) in the first to 94.7% (IQR: 75.6-100) in the third sequence; in those aged 80 + median PDC rose from 95.0% (IQR: 68.9-100) in the first to 100% (IQR: 78.3-100) in the third sequence. Logistic regression identified age (OR=1.011 per year), female gender (OR=0.896), high-intensity treatment (OR=0.975), and second (OR=1.267) or later treatment sequences (OR=1.704) as significant predictors of adherence (all p < 0.001).
conclusionAdherence to statin therapy improves with subsequent treatment sequences and age. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance adherence, particularly among younger patients. The PDC metric is recommended for integration into clinical practice to monitor and improve medication adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.