Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Optimizing genomic diversity assessments for conservation of Bromus auleticus (Trinius ex Nees) using individual and pooled sequencing.

Luciana Gillman, Federico Condón, Cesar Petroli, Mercedes Rivas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luciana GillmanDepartamento de Sistemas Agrarios y Paisajes Culturales, Centro Universitario Regional del Este, Universidad de la República, Treinta y tres y Rocha, Uruguay.ORCID 0009-0009-3679-1581
Federico CondónINIA Estanzuela, Unidad de Semillas y Recursos Fitogenéticos, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-3607
Cesar PetroliCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT), El Batán, Texcoco, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-248X
Mercedes RivasDepartamento de Sistemas Agrarios y Paisajes Culturales, Centro Universitario Regional del Este, Universidad de la República, Treinta y tres y Rocha, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bromus auleticus, a valuable forage grass native to the Pampa biome, is currently undergoing genetic erosion. Therefore, it is essential to assess appropriate methodologies for developing population genomic studies that will contribute to the conservation of this genetic resource. In this study, we evaluated five accessions using two genotyping strategies: individual sequencing (ind-seq) and pooled sequencing (pool-seq). To assess methodologies effectiveness, the correlation between allele frequencies calculated using each approach was investigated, as well as genetic diversity and population structure. These comparisons explicitly accounted for the potential effects of factors such as sample size, missing data, sequencing depth, and minor allele frequencies. The highest values of frequencies concordance and percentage of SNPs in common between ind-seq and pool-seq were achieved using a sample size of 30-60 plants per accession. These values were obtained with a maximum missing data threshold of 10% and a less strict minimum allele frequency threshold for pool-seq (0.01) compared to ind-seq (0.05). Pool-seq required a higher sequencing depth per accession (4.8 million reads) compared to ind-seq (0.9 million reads) to achieve similar allele frequencies. Pools of 50 individuals yielded the highest number of polymorphic sites, averaging over 9,000 per accession at a sequencing depth of 4.8 Mr. Under these conditions, pool-seq consistently resulted in an average of 0.09 higher expected heterozygosity and a 0.24 lower allelic richness compared to ind-seq in all accessions. Population structure inferred with both methodologies confirmed the outcrossing nature of B. auleticus and aligned with the geographical origin of each accession. The average inbreeding coefficient of 0.2 evidence inbreeding, which highlights the importance of conservation efforts for this valuable plant genetic resource. Based on these findings, we propose two workflows for conducting population genomics studies on Bromus auleticus.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenomicsGene FrequencyGenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID40560985
PMCPMC12194279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.