Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561497›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2025

Health Care Professionals' Use of Digital Technology in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Austria: Online Survey Study.

Luisa Lunz, Sabine Würth, Stefan Tino Kulnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luisa LunzLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Lindhofstrasse 22, Salzburg, 5020, Austria, 43 57255 ext 82712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3672-8091
Sabine WürthDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-1724
Stefan Tino KulnikLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Lindhofstrasse 22, Salzburg, 5020, Austria, 43 57255 ext 82712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-6713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in digital technology, such as health apps and telerehabilitation systems, offer promising treatment modalities in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, the successful adoption of digital technology in clinical practice depends on a variety of factors. A comprehensive understanding of the influencing factors on digital technology usage in health care can support the complex implementation process of digital technology in clinical practice. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators of digital technology usage in cardiovascular disease secondary prevention from the perspective of health care professionals, and to explore whether certain characteristics of health care professionals are related to the current usage of digital technology in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted an exploratory online survey, inquiring about the perspectives and uses of digital technologies in cardiovascular disease secondary prevention. We developed an original questionnaire to address the study aim. The survey invitation was distributed among health care professionals from November 2021 to February 2022, via all cardiac rehabilitation centers, all community-based disease management services for patients with chronic heart failure, and all relevant national health care professional associations in Austria. Qualitative survey data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparison tests, and association statistics. Results: Overall, 125 health care professionals (mean age 41, SD 11 y; n=80, 64% females) across different professions and settings, including cardiac rehabilitation phases I through IV, were recruited. General readiness for using digital technologies in the care of cardiac patients was high, but only 65 (52%) respondents reported doing so. The top 3 rated barriers to digital technology use were poor user-experience of devices and apps, lack of cost coverage, and low digital competence of patients. The top 3 rated potential application areas for digital technology were organization and appointment planning, documenting treatments, and creating personalized treatment plans. The top 3 rated facilitators for digital technology use were assurance of patient safety, assurance of patients' privacy, and availability of technical support. Greater personal use of digital technology, younger age, and higher technology affinity of health care professionals was associated with higher readiness to use digital technology with cardiac patients. Conclusions: While there is interest in digital technology for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Austria, barriers to uptake need to be addressed. Our findings may inform the design and implementation of future digitalization projects.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDigital TechnologyHealth PersonnelSecondary PreventionAdultAustriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicinebarrierscardiac rehabilitationcross-sectionaldigital healthelectronic healthfacilitatorsmobile healthquestionnairetelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40561497
PMCPMC12221187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.