Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562460›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2025

Current status of school vision screening-rationale, models, impact and challenges: a review.

Julie-Anne Little, Ving Fai Chan, Seang-Mei Saw, Yih Chung Tham, Ling Chew, Li Lian Foo, Megan Collins, Anne Effiom Ebri, Xiaotong Han, Linda Schultz and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Teacher-Administered School Vision Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Binocular Vision Anomalies in Scotland at Age 3.5-5.5 Years: An Epidemiological Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Julie-Anne LittleBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK ja.little@ulster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-8066
Ving Fai ChanCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-7953
Seang-Mei SawNational University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-796X
Yih Chung ThamOphthalmology, National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-797X
Ling ChewNational University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9584-0410
Li Lian FooSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7785-9556
Megan CollinsWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-0848
Anne Effiom EbriPublic Health, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7340-3172
Xiaotong HanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-3447
Linda SchultzLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-0640
Deborah GleasonPerkins School for the Blind, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3310-6828
Lisa JacobsELP, Perkins School for the Blind, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6944-5145
Winston D PrakashLV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5517-5901
Priya MorjariaClinical Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-1948
Samantha Kleindienst RoblerCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-8084
Susan D EmmettCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4257-8161
Graeme MacKenzieClearly, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-8557
Ningli WangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-4482
Rohit C KhannaLV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-5562
Donald BundyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-6131
Nathan CongdonCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-3416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment in children globally, and studies have demonstrated that spectacle correction addresses the large majority of childhood vision impairment. Furthermore, trial evidence illustrates the beneficial impact of spectacles on learning, with effect sizes exceeding that of other school health interventions. While it is established that good vision is important for learning and optimising childhood development and quality of life, many countries lack healthcare systems that provide vision screening or universal access to eyecare for all citizens. This review examined school vision screening across several regions/countries, focusing on conditions that should be targeted and the corresponding interventions. The range of international models, the status of global refractive service coverage and measures needed for improvement are discussed. Vision screening protocols need to effectively detect vision impairment, seamlessly connect with intervention services to deliver spectacles and signpost for future access to eyecare. Conditions which may not be treatable with spectacles alone, including amblyopia, strabismus and other ocular diseases, also warrant signposting for treatment. The vision community must unite to urge governments to invest in building service capacity; allocating the necessary resources and effectively developing public health systems to support vision screening and access to eyecare. Schools play a crucial role in enabling population-based vision screening and need to be supported with eyecare interventions and resources. This will ensure optimised approaches to correct avoidable vision loss and provide children with the educational and health outcomes they deserve.

Indexed as

Refractive ErrorsSchool Health ServicesSchoolsVision DisordersVision ScreeningChildEyeglassesHumansChild health (paediatrics)Public healthVision

Identifiers

PMID40562460
PMCPMC12573433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.