ReviewCancers2025
Advances in Molecular Imaging for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogenous group of tumors with significant inter- and intra-patient variability. Once considered to be rare, neuroendocrine neoplasms are being increasingly recognized through the advent of advanced diagnostic techniques, which may be contributing to the significant increase in the incidence and detection rate of these tumors. NENs can be classified into well differentiated and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The proliferation rate of NETs can vary from Ki-67 1-55%. In addition, the SSTR expression can vary significantly. Because of this high "heterogeneity", their detection and characterization have become essential to disease management, leading to dual-tracer imaging, most commonly with FDG- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT. Because of the complexity of the disease, the optimal treatment of patients depends on a combination of imaging, serological biomarkers, and clinical information. There remains a significant portion of patients who do not respond as anticipated, and the management of their disease remains challenging with current techniques, necessitating the refinement of our technologies and the development of new ones. In addition to new biological targets, improved peptide vector targeting for the somatostatin receptor needs further development. This review aims to evaluate the existing imaging techniques utilized in the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of NENs, as well as the emerging radiopharmaceuticals and technologies, which will expand our imaging repertoire as well as our management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.