ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Characterisation of the Faecal Microbiome of Alpacas Raised in South Eastern Australia.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Different Forage Sources on Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Hormone Concentrations, and Intestinal Microbiota in Alpacas.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is limited investigation of the alpaca microbiome on a global scale, with no previous research conducted in Australia characterising the faecal microbiome. The microbiome composition in other ruminants has been shown to impact feed efficiency, average daily gain and methane production. This study aimed to characterise the faecal microbiome of alpacas raised in south-eastern Australia and identify variation across geographic regions. Faecal samples were collected from 59 healthy adult female alpacas, aged between 15 months and 17 years in NSW, Australia. Firmicutes were identified as the dominant phyla, accounting for 57.78% of the cumulative abundance, followed by Bacteroidota (29.12%). These two phyla accounted for 90% of the taxa, with the cumulative abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteriodota significantly differing (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.