ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Epidermolysis Bullosa.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovations in topical epidermolysis bullosa treatment: integrating advanced dressings, bioactive therapies and tissue-engineered skin.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Regenerative Potential of Various Plant-Derived Exosome Injections in Laser-Induced Skin Wound Healing in a Rabbit Model.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: current advances in preparation and therapeutic applications for neurological disorders.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a debilitating genetic skin disorder characterized by extreme fragility, chronic wounds, and severe complications, particularly in its most severe form, recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB). Current treatments focus on symptomatic relief through wound care and pain management, with recent FDA approvals of Vyjuvek and Filsuvez providing new but limited therapeutic options. However, emerging research highlights the potential of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells as a promising approach to address both the symptoms and underlying pathology of EB. EVs function as carriers of bioactive molecules, modulating inflammation, promoting tissue regeneration, and even delivering functional type VII collagen to RDEB patient cells. Unlike whole-cell therapies, EVs are non-immunogenic, have greater stability, and avoid risks such as graft-versus-host disease or tumorigenic transformation. Additionally, EVs offer diverse administration routes, including topical application, local injection, and intravenous delivery, which could extend their therapeutic reach beyond skin lesions to systemic manifestations of EB. However, challenges remain, including standardization of EV production, scalability, and ensuring consistent therapeutic potency. Despite these hurdles, EV-based therapies represent a transformative step toward addressing the complex pathology of EB, with the potential to improve wound healing, reduce fibrosis, and enhance patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.