ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated Risser Grade Assessment of Pelvic Bones Using Deep Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aimed to develop a deep learning model using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate Risser grade assessment from pelvic radiographs. (2) Methods: We used 1619 pelvic radiographs from patients aged 12-18 years with scoliosis to train two CNN models-one for the right pelvis and one for the left. A multimodal approach incorporated 224 × 224-pixel regions of interest from radiographs, alongside patient age and gender. The models were optimized with Adam, weight decay, rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation, dropout, and batch normalization, while synthetic data augmentation addressed class imbalance. Performance was evaluated through accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC). (3) Results: The right pelvis model achieved 83.64% accuracy; the left pelvis model reached 80.56%. Both models performed well for Risser Grades 0, 2, and 4, with the right pelvis model achieving a microaverage F1-score of 0.836 and ROC AUC of 0.895. The left pelvis model achieved a microaverage F1-score of 0.806 and ROC AUC of 0.872. Challenges arose from class imbalance in less frequent grades. (4) Conclusions: CNN models effectively automated Risser grade assessment, reducing clinician workload and variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.