ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing MRI Scheduling in High-Complexity Hospitals: A Digital Twin and Reinforcement Learning Approach.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Twins for Hospital and Healthcare Operations: A Systematic Review of Resource Allocation, Infection Control, and Workflow Optimization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Determining the MRI Examination Experience: The Relationship Between Waiting Times, Information Provision, and Patient Anxiety.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Concordance-Based Validation of Electronic Health Records and Modality Log Files to Improve MRI Exam Duration Prediction and Scheduling Performance.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based reconstruction improves MRI image quality and diagnostic performance for carotid atherosclerotic plaques.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) services in high-complexity hospitals often suffer from operational inefficiencies, including suboptimal MRI machine utilization, prolonged patient waiting times, and inequitable service delivery across clinical priority levels. Addressing these challenges requires intelligent scheduling strategies capable of dynamically managing patient waitlists based on clinical urgency while optimizing resource allocation. In this study, we propose a novel framework that integrates a digital twin (DT) of the MRI operational environment with a reinforcement learning (RL) agent trained via Deep Q-Networks (DQN). The digital twin simulates realistic hospital dynamics using parameters extracted from a MRI publicly available dataset, modeling patient arrivals, examination durations, MRI machine reliability, and clinical priority stratifications. Our strategy learns policies that maximize MRI machine utilization, minimize average waiting times, and ensure fairness by prioritizing urgent cases in the patient waitlist. Our approach outperforms traditional baselines, achieving a 14.5% increase in MRI machine utilization, a 44.8% reduction in average patient waiting time, and substantial improvements in priority-weighted fairness compared to First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) and static priority heuristics. Our strategy is designed to support hospital deployment, offering scalability, adaptability to dynamic operational conditions, and seamless integration with existing healthcare information systems. By advancing the use of digital twins and reinforcement learning in healthcare operations, our work provides a promising pathway toward optimizing MRI services, improving patient satisfaction, and enhancing clinical outcomes in complex hospital environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.