ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Co-Creating a District-Wide Professional Development Program and Implementation Model for Trauma-Informed Schools.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research practice partnerships (RPP) between schools and researchers present a promising approach to co-creating scalable professional development for trauma-informed schools. This study used an RPP to develop an implementation model for a trauma-informed professional development program across 15 schools in a major urban school district. The primary study goal was to describe the RPP's co-design processes used to develop and mount a large-scale professional development program with accompanying implementation supports. A secondary goal was to provide representative case examples of feedback loops for real-time improvements to the implementation strategies. A rapid mixed methods approach drawing on the principles of developmental evaluation was used to collect implementation process data including RPP team meeting notes and documents, informal discussions, training and survey completion reports, attendance, and implementation workshop exit tickets. These data were triangulated to conduct preliminary analyses which were then presented to RPP team members for collaborative review. Results highlighted seven co-designed elements of the TISE implementation support system-engaging and supporting school leadership, implementation teams, live and asynchronous training, ongoing consultation, delivering practical resources, relationship building, and continuous improvement. Exemplar feedback loops highlighted immediate improvements to implementation resources via exit tickets and enhanced strategies for building long-term school-level team effectiveness and engagement via attendance tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.