ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Anti-lymphoma Activity of Acyclic Terpenoids and Its Structure-Activity Relationship: In Vivo, In Vitro, and In Silico Studies.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Essential Oils as a Source of Anticancer Molecules: Critical Assessment of Current Evidence and Methodological Limitations-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic evaluation of double-expressor lymphoma: prognostic impact, determinants of outcome, and comparative efficacy and safety of novel therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Constituents, Health-Promoting Effects, Processing Technologies, and Industrial Applications ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expanding the Knowledge of the Molecular Effects and Therapeutic Potential of Incomptine A for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: In Vivo and Bioinformatics Studies, Part III.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Terpenoids are a large group of molecules present in several plant species and in many essential oils reported with cytotoxic and anticancer properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anticancer activity of eleven acyclic terpenes; seven monoterpenoids: geranyl acetate (C1), geranic acid (C2), citral (C3, mixture of neral and geranial), geraniol (C4), methyl geranate (C5), nerol (C6) and citronellic acid (C7); two sesquiterpenes: farnesal (C8) and farnesol (C9); and one triterpene: squalene (C10), using in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models. Anti-lymphoma activity was evaluated using male Balb/c mice inoculated with U-937 cells. Cytotoxic activity was evaluated using the WST-1 method. Computer tools were used to obtain a molecular docking study, measuring pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of the acyclic terpenoids with greater antitumor activity. The results showed that the terpenoids with the highest cytotoxic and nodal growth inhibitory activity were C3, C4, C6, and C9, and their effects were better compared to MTX. The data obtained suggest that the anti-lymphoma activity could be due to the presence of the aldehyde, hydroxyl, and acetate groups in the C1 of the monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes evaluated. The theoretical results obtained from molecular docking showed that geranial (C3A), neral (C3B), C9, and C6 terpenoids obtained a higher affinity for the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme and suggest that it could be a target to induce anti-lymphoma activity of bioactive terpenoids. Our study provides evidence that C3, C6, and C9 could be potential anticancer agents for the treatment of histiocytic lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.