ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Red Blood Cell, White Blood Cell, and Platelet Counts as Differentiating Factors in Cardiovascular Patients with and Without Current Myocardial Infarction.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning-based framework for predicting hypertension using serum hematological factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bootstrap-Augmented Analysis of Non-Linear Associations Between Glucose, hsCRP, and First Myocardial Infarction in a Cardiovascular Population.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Association Between Periodontal Disease and Blood Biomarkers in U.S. Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases continue to pose a major global health burden, contributing significantly to mortality rates worldwide. This study aimed to explore the association between myocardial infarction and basic hematological parameters-red blood cells (RBCs), white blood cells (WBCs), and platelets (PLTs)-which are routinely assessed in clinical diagnostics. The analysis was conducted on a cohort of 743 adults hospitalized with diagnosed cardiovascular conditions. To identify blood parameters that distinguish patients with a history of first-time myocardial infarction from those who had never experienced such an event, we employed a dual analytic approach. Standard parametric methods were complemented with bootstrap resampling to strengthen inference and mitigate the impact of sampling variability. Patients with myocardial infarction showed decreased RBC and elevated WBC counts relative to those without infarction. These associations were non-linear, with the most pronounced group differences observed within the second and third quartiles of RBC and WBC distributions, while minimal differences appeared at the distributional extremes. No significant differences were found in platelet count (PLT) between the groups. Bootstrap validation not only corroborated findings obtained through traditional statistics, but also enhanced the robustness of the results, providing improved estimates under data conditions prone to skewness or small sample artifacts. This approach enabled the detection of nuanced patterns that might elude classical inference. Our findings emphasize the utility of resampling techniques in clinical research settings, particularly where inference stability is critical. Incorporating such methods in future investigations may advance statistical rigor, increase reproducibility, and better capture complex biological relationships in medical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.