ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Anticoagulation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Critical Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Anticoagulation approaches in hemodialysis: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and literature gap.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of end-stage renal disease on stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- When the Heart and Hip Collide: The Interplay Between Atrial Fibrillation and Neck of Femur Fractures.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Antithrombotic Therapy After PCI in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients: Navigating Complexity Beyond Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Chemical Synthesis and Biochemical Evaluation of Decasulfated Galloylglucopyranose Heparin Mimetic.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Heparin-Coated Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters Improve Failure-Free Survival in ESRD.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Anticoagulation Therapy in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Balancing Bleeding and Thromboembolic Risk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning for precision warfarin dosing: a comprehensive narrative review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of A4C, CHAMPS, and CAGIB Scores for Risk Stratification in Hemodialysis Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Apixaban and Acenocoumarol in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) and its advanced stage, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), affect millions worldwide and are associated with a paradoxical hemostatic imbalance-marked by both increased thrombotic and bleeding risks-which complicates anticoagulant use and demands clearer, evidence-based clinical guidance.
designThis study is a critical review synthesizing the current literature on anticoagulant therapy in CKD and ESRD, with emphasis on altered pharmacokinetics, clinical complications, and therapeutic adjustments. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for articles discussing anticoagulation in CKD/ESRD, focusing on pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, and dosing recommendations. STUDY SELECTION: Studies examining the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of anticoagulants-including heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)-in CKD and ESRD populations were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Key findings were summarized to highlight the dose modifications, therapeutic considerations, and clinical challenges in managing anticoagulation in CKD/patients with ESRD. Emphasis was placed on balancing thrombotic and bleeding risks and identifying gaps in existing guidelines.
resultsPatients with CKD and ESRD exhibit a paradoxical hypercoagulable state marked by platelet dysfunction, altered coagulation factors, and vascular endothelial damage. This condition increases the risk of thrombotic events, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), while simultaneously elevating bleeding risks. Hemodialysis and CKD-associated variables further complicate the management of coagulation. Among anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is preferred due to its short half-life and adjustability based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) offer predictable pharmacokinetics but require dose adjustments in CKD stages 4 and 5 due to reduced clearance. Warfarin necessitates careful dosing based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to maintain an international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 4, minimizing bleeding risks. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), particularly Apixaban, are recommended for patients with eGFR < 15 mL/min or those on dialysis, although data on other DOACs in CKD remain limited. The lack of comprehensive guidelines for anticoagulant use in CKD and ESRD highlights the need for individualized, patient-centered approaches that account for comorbidities, genetics, and clinical context.
conclusionsManaging anticoagulation in CKD/ESRD is challenging due to complex coagulation profiles and altered pharmacokinetics. Judicious dosing, close monitoring, and patient-centered care are critical. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish clear guidelines and optimize therapy for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.