Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40565614›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Food Allergenicity Evaluation Methods: Classification, Principle, and Applications.

Huiqiao Zhou, Xiao Chen, Xin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Proteomic andFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Synthetic Biology Approaches to Enzymology in Food and Agriculture Systems.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huiqiao ZhouState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China.
Xiao ChenState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China.
Xin LiState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9466-2659

Funding

Jiangxi Nutrition and Health Management Medical Research Institute Cultivation Project 2022-PYXM-05Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China 20232ACB205022National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFF1105905Special Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong Province NO.2022B0202030002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of food allergies is increasing annually, emerging as a significant global concern for food safety and public health. To prevent allergic reactions, patients are advised to avoid ingesting allergenic foods. However, completely avoiding contact with such foods in real life is often challenging. Therefore, the development of reliable allergenicity evaluation methods is essential to assist food allergy patients in avoiding exposure to allergenic foods. These evaluation methods include mass spectrometry-based methods, bioinformatics predictions, simulated digestion, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, cell-based models, and animal models. Each method operates on distinct principles and is suited for specific evaluation contexts. This review systematically summarizes the pathogenesis of food allergies and details the principles and practical applications of common allergenicity evaluation methods. By highlighting recent studies in food allergenicity evaluation, we aim to deepen the understanding of allergenicity assessment and offer an overview with perspectives on its enhancement.

Indexed as

allergenicity evaluationepitopefood allergenfood allergyIgE-mediated allergyimmune responses

Identifiers

PMID40565614
PMCPMC12191692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.